Bargain Reviews
- 0 likes영암출장샵『카톡ND112』◈24시출장안마⌠일본여성출장만남⌡영암콜걸&영If you are looking for more information about flat rate locksmith Las Vegas check that right away. Snokido ... (05/05/2024 07:28:07)
- 2 likesBuy high quality carpets in Melbourne at economic priceshttps://dehraduncallgirlz.com/ ... (05/05/2024 06:57:59)
- 2 likesBuy high quality carpets in Melbourne at economic priceshttps://dehraduncallgirlz.com/https://dehraduncallgirlz.com/2024/03/31/call-girl-in-vasant-kunj/https://dehraduncallgirlz.com/2024/04/01/call-girls-in-lucknow/https://dehraduncallgirlz.com/2024/03/30/ ... (05/05/2024 06:57:45)
- 0 likes아이슬란드 그린다비크 지역의 화산 폭발 경고와 대피 조치I admire this article for the well-researched content and excellent wording. I got so involved in this material that I couldn’t stop reading. I am impressed with your work and skill. Thank you so much ... (05/05/2024 06:36:34)
Gucci Under Fire For Using Real Tigers In Ad Campaign
Gucci Under Fire For Using Real Tigers In Ad Campaign
Luxury fashion house Gucci is facing backlash for using real tigers in an advertising campaign. Earlier this month, the Italian designer launched the Gucci Tiger collection to celebrate the Chinese Year of the Tiger, which starts on February 1. Customers and animal rights activists, however, expressed dismay at the use of real tigers for the photoshoot. Gucci's disclaimer about no animals being harmed during the shoot did little to pacify the outrage. To get more news about gucci tiger, you can visit shine news official website.
The Gucci ad campaign shows tigers lounging on rugs and perched on pianos. In their Instagram caption, Gucci said that the American Humane society "monitored the set on which animals were present and verified that no animals were harmed."
Several Instagram users, however, criticised the fashion house for using real tigers. "It's not okay to have wild animals in advertising," one comment read. "If you do not use fur, stop using wild animals in marketing. Collection is lovely but real tiger is not," another said. "The tiger is not a pet," an Instagram user remarked.
On Monday, Big Cat Rescue founder Carole Baskin, who found fame with the Netflix series Tiger King, joined the chorus of voices criticising Gucci.
"This sort of ad campaign sends the worst possible message; which is that tigers are disposable products to be used for capitalism and discarded at will," she told Yahoo News. "It diminished the magnificence of the tiger and makes Gucci look bad.Several other animal welfare organisations have slammed Gucci. The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) urged their followers to "tell them to STOP using wild animals in their ads!"
Meanwhile, in a tweet shared Tuesday, World Animal Protection US wrote: "Gucci is sending the wrong message by promoting tigers as pets and luxury items when they are wild animals who belong in the wild."
Gucci said that "the tigers were photographed and filmed in a separate safe environment complying to Gucci's policies and then featured within the campaign."
The use of wild animals in photoshoots has long been a contentious issue. Last year, a Dubai couple's decision to use a tiger in a gender reveal stunt has sparked similar outrage on social media.
Luxury fashion house Gucci is facing backlash for using real tigers in an advertising campaign. Earlier this month, the Italian designer launched the Gucci Tiger collection to celebrate the Chinese Year of the Tiger, which starts on February 1. Customers and animal rights activists, however, expressed dismay at the use of real tigers for the photoshoot. Gucci's disclaimer about no animals being harmed during the shoot did little to pacify the outrage. To get more news about gucci tiger, you can visit shine news official website.
The Gucci ad campaign shows tigers lounging on rugs and perched on pianos. In their Instagram caption, Gucci said that the American Humane society "monitored the set on which animals were present and verified that no animals were harmed."
Several Instagram users, however, criticised the fashion house for using real tigers. "It's not okay to have wild animals in advertising," one comment read. "If you do not use fur, stop using wild animals in marketing. Collection is lovely but real tiger is not," another said. "The tiger is not a pet," an Instagram user remarked.
On Monday, Big Cat Rescue founder Carole Baskin, who found fame with the Netflix series Tiger King, joined the chorus of voices criticising Gucci.
"This sort of ad campaign sends the worst possible message; which is that tigers are disposable products to be used for capitalism and discarded at will," she told Yahoo News. "It diminished the magnificence of the tiger and makes Gucci look bad.Several other animal welfare organisations have slammed Gucci. The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) urged their followers to "tell them to STOP using wild animals in their ads!"
Meanwhile, in a tweet shared Tuesday, World Animal Protection US wrote: "Gucci is sending the wrong message by promoting tigers as pets and luxury items when they are wild animals who belong in the wild."
Gucci said that "the tigers were photographed and filmed in a separate safe environment complying to Gucci's policies and then featured within the campaign."
The use of wild animals in photoshoots has long been a contentious issue. Last year, a Dubai couple's decision to use a tiger in a gender reveal stunt has sparked similar outrage on social media.
qocsuing 268 days ago
Until 09/09/2023 00:00:00
Share this bargain with your friends: