Monks and philosophers

Mathieu-To be precise, there is no causal relationship between entities, only what you call structural relationships between temporary phenomena, which we call interdependent relationships: "This thing exists because there is another thing, and this thing occurs on the basis of that thing." No event exists on its own regardless of other phenomena. Each element in the causal chain is itself a collection of many instantaneous elements in eternal change, so there is no continuity in time by many independent elements that are different from each other. This argument reveals the unreality of autonomous, persistent phenomena, whether it is a creator God or an atom that exists without cause or condition and does not depend on other phenomena. Jean-Francois – This is also a method of questioning that we have encountered throughout the history of Western philosophy. Sometimes phenomena exist and are reality. This is what people call the empiricist or realist school. Sometimes the phenomenon is a complete illusion, and this is what is called absolute idealism, as in the philosophy of Berkeley in the eighteenth century. Sometimes the phenomenon is a chaotic mass of interconnected things, but in this many things, the causal relationship is completely illusory, which is Hume's philosophy. Sometimes the phenomenon itself is not a reality, it is a synthesis, a meeting of the reality itself behind the phenomenon,saw palmetto extract, which we do not know, and the construction activity of the human spirit, which is the intermediate result between the primitive material provided by the reality itself and the creative ability of the human spirit. To put it another way, it is half provided by the external world and half constructed by the human spirit, and it is simultaneously real. This is a crude generalization of Kant's theory in the Critique of Pure Reason. Therefore, all cases of figure have been considered in Western philosophy. As far as my opinion is concerned,glucosamine sulfate and chondroitin sulfate, I don't believe this is a real problem. If there is no phenomenon in Buddhism, then what is there? Born in 1685, died in 1753, English theologian and philosopher. After joining the church, he taught Greek, Hebrew and theology in Dublin. He is the author of Interpretation of Vision Theory and Principles of Human Cognition. Denying all reality external to thought, its central thesis "to be is to be perceived or perceived" is customarily regarded as the basis of a subjective idealist philosophy (or empiricist and nominalist idealism). Mathieu – Buddhism takes a middle path. It does not deny the reality of phenomena in the relative world known by sense, but denies that there are some persistent entities behind these phenomena. It is precisely because of this attitude that people say that this is a "middle way", which neither falls into nihilism nor into "eternalism". For nihilism, there is nothing outside our perception, phycocyanin spirulina ,pumpkin seed extract, everything is nothing, while "eternalism" may be what you call realism, for which there is a unique reality independent of all perception, which may be composed of self-existing entities. Buddhism refutes solid entities such as indivisible particles of matter, the indivisible instant of consciousness. We are again confronted with the expressions of modern physicists who have abandoned the idea of particles as tiny cannonballs or infinitely small masses. What people call mass or matter, to be exact, is a condensation of energy. Neutrinos, for example, are massless, uncharged "particles" that are neither electric nor magnetic, and at this very moment, billions of neutrinos are passing through our bodies and the earth from side to side, without slowing down their movement. Buddhism gives us a conception of the unreality of the solid world through an intellectual step that does not claim to be a scientific theory, but that intellectually examines the very possibility of the existence of atoms, etymologically "indivisible particles.".
Jean-Francois – According to Buddhism, are there two levels of reality: the phenomenal level and the underlying real matrix, even if this matrix is not composed of material atoms and is ultimately energy? Mathieu – When Buddhism talks about the "emptiness" of phenomena, it says that they "manifest," but they do not in any way reflect the existence of fixed entities. Modern physics tells us that, for example, an electron can be regarded as both a particle and a wave (onde), and that these two concepts are completely incompatible with common sense. Some of the interference phenomena caused by electrons can only be explained by assuming that an electron passes through two different holes at the same moment. According to Buddhism, the atom cannot be understood as a fixed entity existing in a single definite form; so how can the world, which is considered to be composed of these particles with superficial manifestations, have a fixed reality? All of this helps to destroy our conception of the solidity of appearances. It is in this sense that Buddhism affirms that the ultimate essence of phenomena is emptiness, and that emptiness itself has an infinite potential for expression. Jean-Francois – These premonitory assumptions about the nature and infirmity of matter are made by … Mathieu.. Expressed by the Buddha, it was later compiled and explained in many treatises by two of the greatest Buddhist philosophers, Nagarjuna (about the second century of the Christian era) and Yuesheng (the eighth century). The analysis of atoms is as follows: Let us observe a crude phenomenon, such as a table. If we break down its components, it is no longer a table, but a few legs, a board and so on. Then, if we reduce them to sawdust, these components lose their identity. If we now examine a grain of sawdust, one will find some neutrons,lutein eye complex, and then some atoms — the idea of atoms having been proposed in the East in the time of Democritus. Jean-Francois-In fact, the concept of the atom appears in the philosophies of Demokrit and Epicurus. But it has not been more scientifically demonstrated in them than in other theories of ancient physics. It's just a spiritual argument. Mathieu – Strangely, the Greek word "atome" means "insecable.". prius-biotech.com